Service :
09 April 2017 - 22:37
News ID: 428791
A
British Diplomat:
Rasa - British former ambassador to Syria believes that the Syrian government has not chemical weapons in Khan Sheikhoun, and undermined the possibility of conducting the chemical attack by the Syrian Army, suggesting that the Syrian authorities were wise enough to know any use of chemicals would backfire.
Chemical attack victim

Rasa - Peter Ford, who served in Damascus from 2003 to 2006, added that it was out of character for the Syrian president to provoke the US, especially when Washington was taking a softer line compared to Barack Obama's policies on Syria, Al Waght reported.

 

According to the British diplomat "Assad is not mad and would have known that when Donald Trump produced an olive branch in his direction, any use of chemical weapons would have been counter-productive."

 

In the weeks before the deadly attack, US officials said that to remove Assad from power was no longer a top priority.

 

"He is someone who doesn't leap without looking. He is trained as an ophthalmologist," said Ford, who said he regularly met Assad during his service in Damascus. "He has an analytical mind and knows that actions have consequences."

 

Ford has disputed widespread reports that the Syrian government carried out a chemical attack. Instead, he is inclined to believe that Syrian aircraft inadvertently bombed a rebel-controlled chemical warfare factory or stockpile.

 

He said there should be "no rush to judgment, no rush to war" because of the chemical incident in Khan Sheikhoun; instead, there needs to be a proper investigation into the facts of what happened before decisions were taken.

 

847/940

Tags: Syria Chemical
Send comment
Please type in your comments in English.
The comments that contain insults or libel to individuals, ethnicities, or contradictions with the laws of the country and religious teachings will not be disclosed